
Senator Barack Obama's aura of inevitability in the battle for the Democratic presidential nomination has diminished in the wake of his loss in the Pennsylvania primary and the furor over his former pastor, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News Poll.
The survey suggests a very competitive race this November regardless of who the Democrats nominate. In a head-to-head race between Mr. Obama and Mr. McCain, both candidates are backed by 45 percent of the registered voters. In a race between Mrs. Clinton and Mr. McCain, 48 percent back Mrs. Clinton, while 43 percent back Mr. McCain.
Next Tuesday should clear the picture somewhat.
Why won't Americans -- all Americans -- kneel before the annointed?
Your comment does not deserve a response other than read the Newsvine Code of Honor.
I hope you do not wallow in too much despair in the next four years.
You, too, cannot bear for Obama's character to be questioned?
You, too, cannot bear for Obama's character to be questioned?
You weren't questioning his character, you were belittling him and the majority of Americans that have voted for him.
The code of honor refers to personal attacks on other Newsvine users. For comparison, read some comments about, president Bush, or Christians, or liberals in general.
Obama has brought this upon himself. With the current state of affairs, we're left to question whether Obama was oblivious of what went on at his church, or he's pulling a con job over what he truly does believe.
If he is nominated, this will come up again in the fall.
It should. He can act noble but he's a few answers short of honesty.
The general election will be interesting.
I don't think they will backroads voters are becoming more independent towards him.I could be wrong. Wright has created a major problems for super delegates from what I have been reading, voting for Senator Obama could create a backlash on their elections, probably in any State.
Diane, David Broder in Thursday's Washington Post, echoes that type of growing doubt about Obama.
One thing going for the democrats is there is no need to choose before June, giving them two months, Something could happen by then.
OK, I think the Denver convention will be real zoo. Wright may be in the vanguard.
A replay of Chicago 40 years ago.
Already, at least one group is promising (threatening) just that.
A real posibility, especially if Clinton wins.
I think it will happen no matter who clenches the nomination.
Yes, that is very likely.
backroads, perhaps that is the article I read? Can you imagine him bringing down the rest of the Democrats? It could happen, it has happened before.
I just read an article on the Vine, that talks about hillary running as an Independent. That would really surprise me.
It is also possible that if Obama loses the nomination the left wing democrats will run an independent candidate.
Meanwhile, during the primaries we had McCain, who once criticized the late Jerry Falwell for being lunatic fringe, paying homage to the "Moral Majority" pastor who once suggested all homosexuals be sent to concentration camps and that 9/11 was God's punishment for Hollywood. I don't see the media beating on McCain's door asking him if he still agrees with his flip-flop from disdain to support of Falwell and other religious right-wing nutcases. Next, we'll have McCain meeting with Pat Robertson and every other theocratic nutter from the extreme right, but no one from the media will raise an eyebrow because it is expected that any GOP candidate has to suck up to the Bible Belt to get elected. Hypocrisy, anyone?
You are way off base. You are upset when Obama is attacked, then you make even worse attacks on McCain.
One fact. Thousands of politicians and preachers have endorsed all three candidates. Only one candidate was a member of a chuirch whose pastor said such things as Wright.
Please O-K actually go and listen to Jeremiah Wright's complete sermon instead of the snip its that the media put together. Reverend Wright is right that God should damn America for all of our immorality. We enslaved the Black people, moved the Native American's from their land to reservations, held down women and just about anyone else we felt were inferior. All because we are right and they are wrong. I listened to it the other night on Wisconsin Public Radio and it sure was different than what you hear in the Media.
Andy, factor in what Obama has twice been forced to denounce. If what you say is true, then why has Obama repudiated Wright? We're left to question who's being truthful.
God deals with individuals, not nations. Wright should be giving a way to overcome problems, not damning his country.
Let's see, Bush during 2000 visited and praised Bob Jones University, a place that wouldn't allow mixed races to date each other. Pat Robertson, the nutcase who declared that God would attack Dover, Penn. because the people of that town wanted their kids to learn evolution in schools, supported Giuliani. Bush received mild press on his visit because the media expects right-wing politicians, even "compassionate conservative ones," to say outrageous things because they are all so uber patriotic, so it's OK. Giuliani could have refuted Robertson's support, but he didn't; neither was he asked by the media to defend it. As far as church attendance goes, Ronald Reagan, that champion of the Christian Right didn't even attend church and had his wife consult astrologers for making his trips. My point here is that the subtext in the Obama/Wright case is that white America gets shocked! shocked! to hear criticism from any black of stature. Therefore, by association, Obama gets tarnished by the reverend and questioned for his loyalties in a way none of the other candidates have been.
None of what you say excuses Wright. Or Obama. And a visit is not the same as sitting in church with a nutcase for 20 years.
Obama followers just don't want to address that glaring detail.
I know. Being endorsed is about five minutes; not like a 20 year association.
Kind of like Cheney's association with Haliburton or the Bush family's longstanding ties to the House of Saud.
Or, I almost forgot, McCain's longtime lobbyist friends working for him while also helping dictators around the globe. Yeah, most of them quit recently, but only when they were outed. Charlie Black remains. At least Obama's connection with the reverend didn't involve cozying up to a thug and a murderer--just a loud mouth. On another note, I saw that as soon as it was revealed that McCain's millionaire trophy wife had investments in the Sudan, they cancelled the investments. Why oh why must McCain do everything only after the media (the few who don't worship at his feet) have exposed his hypocrisy? Other candidates with similar investments dropped them BEFORE the media exposed them. What a phony chump this Keaton-Fiver was and is.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |