
Superdelegates have become central to the race and poised to decide the Democratic nominee because neither Clinton nor Obama is likely to accumulate the necessary 2,025 delegates by the end of the primary season in early June.
At the close of business Wednesday, Clinton led the superdelegate sweepstakes 264-243. But overall, committed superdelegates included, Obama held a 134-delegate advantage, 1,731.5 to 1,598.5.
Indiana and North Carolina will show how the race is going.
OK, do you still think he can win in Nov. and would Hillary go Independent?
He could but would be an underdog. I am beginning to doubt he will be nominated. I have seen some stories that she is considering an independent run. She may do that.
OK, if she goes Independent we could actually see an Independent win and change Politics forever. How would she get financed? The Republicans are building up quite a War Chest!
It's a close race between either her or Obama vs. McCain as it is. You split that vote by even a few percentage points, and McCain wins. I'd love to see a viable third party candidate but people always think in that "lesser of two evils" mentality and it hurts the entire process.
I agree except I WILL vote for Nader.
Public financing is about 70 million. I would send her a check, as would many independents. I would like to see that but it's very unlikely.
The fact that a "super voter" system is what's going to decide the outcome is upsetting to me - regardless of what candidate would win because of it.
I agree. They should all be elected.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |